Measure Development
|
A measure is developed through a defined process by an organization such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), American Medical Association (AMA)-convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI), RPA, and others. The RPA endorses the requirements for practice guidelines and performance measures set forth by the AHRQ. Measures may be directed at the physician-level or facility-level. |
| |
|
| Project Name |
ESRD Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) Project |
Description
|
Balanced Budget Act (BBA) required CMS to develop and implement a method to measure and report the quality of renal dialysis services provided under the Medicare program. To implement this legislation, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) funded the development of CPMs based on KDOQI guidelines. These are being rolled out in phases.
|
| Status |
April 2008 – CMS Phase III developed 26 new facility level CPMs in order to further monitor the quality of care being delivered to ESRD patients.
March 2010, Phase IV – contracted with Arbor Research Collaborative For Health (Arbor Research) and University of Michigan Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center (UM-KECC) to develop Quality Measures for ESRD for Anemia Management/Iron Targets, Mineral and Bone Disorder, Hemodialysis Vascular Access Related Infections, Pediatric Hemodialysis Adequacy,Pediatric Anemia, and Fluid Weight Management. As part of the measure development process, Technical Expert Panels (TEPs) were formed to provide expertise and input. TEPs also defined target values for existing ESRD measures. These measures were submitted to National Quality Forum (NQF) in Sept 2010.
|
RPA's Role
|
Little involvement on an organizational level. A few RPA members were involved in the Clinical Technical Expert Panels.
|
Resources Available/ Participation Information
|
2008 CPMs Status of CMS measures submitted to NQF in Sept 2010 |
| |
|
Project Name
|
AMA Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) |
Description
|
Develops evidence-based, specialty-specific, physician-developed quality measures
|
Status
|
The Kidney Disease Workgroup developed 6 ESRD (adult) measures, 6 CKD measures, and 2 ESRD (pediatric) measures. Adult ESRD and CKD measures were pilot tested in four nephrology practices. Testing was completed and the report was generated in February 2009.
The adult ESRD measures received a time-limited endorsement from NQF. The pediatric measures were not endorsed by NQF. As of December 2010, the CKD measures had not been submitted to NQF because there had not been a “call for CKD measures”.
The workgroup was reconvened Oct 2010 to review/revise the existing CKD and ESRD measures and consider development of new measures based on RPA’s shared decision-making clinical practice guideline that was published in October 2010. These measures were submitted to NQF in June 2011 in response to a “call for renal measures”. |
RPA's Role
|
RPA serves as the lead organization for the Kidney Disease Workgroup. RPA is a voting member of AMA PCPI and frequently consults with content experts.
|
Resources Available/ Participation Information
|
Adult ESRD Measures CKD Measures Pediatric ESRD Measures
|
| |
|
Project Name
|
Kidney Care Partners
|
| Description |
Kidney Care Partners is a coalition of patient advocates, dialysis professionals, care providers and manufacturers working together to improve quality of care for individuals with Chronic Kidney Disease. |
| Status |
KCP Measures workgroup is currently examining the measures CMS has submitted to NQF and will make recommendations to the KCP Board about whether KCP should support a measure as currently specified, support with modifications, or oppose. |
RPA's Role
|
RPA content experts participate in KCP including the measures workgroup. |
Resources Available/ Participation Information
|
KCP Overview List of measures for 2010 KCP review
|
|
|
Measure Review - Endorsement and Adoption
|
Review, revision and endorsement of measures based on evidence. This process that usually entails field testing of the measures prior to consideration for endorsement. RPA recognizes Ambulatory care Quality Alliance (AQA) and National Quality Forum (NQF) as the designated entities who endorse measures.
|
Project Name
|
National Quality Forum (NQF) |
| Description |
Reviews, revises and endorses proposed measures developed by others. Serves as CMS’ preferred measure endorsement entity for public value based purchasing programs. |
Status
|
Ongoing – maintains a clearinghouse of measures that have been endorsed. AMA-PCPI and RPA will submit the adult ESRD measures for maintenance in Jan 2011; additionally, new CKD and palliative care measures will be submitted at that time. |
RPA's Role
|
RPA was granted membership in NQF 12/2005. RPA is a voting member. RPA submitted 4 nominees to serve on the ESRD Steering Committee; 3 were appointed in 2010. RPA, in conjunction with AMA PCPI, submitted 8 measures during the NQF's call for renal measures in June 2011. It is expected that these measures will be reviewed by the NQF CSAC on Aug 16-17, 2011.
|
Resources Available/ Participation Information
|
List of NQF-endorsed measures
|
|
|
Measure Implementation
|
Use of, facilitation of use, of measures and subsequent reporting on/grading of measure use. |
|
|
Project Name
|
Physicians Quality Reporting System (PQRS) (Formerly PQRI) |
Description
|
Use of claims-based, measures groups or registry reporting to report process quality measures for Medicare beneficiaries who met the measure criteria, for incentive bonus payments. |
Status
|
Voluntary CMS Program in place as of 7/1/07. Includes CKD, ESRD, and pediatric ESRD quality measures. Updated annually and published in the Medicare Fee Schedule. 2012 PQRS measures and incentives are included in the final Medicare Fee Schedule.
|
RPA's Role
|
All CKD & ESRD measures in program were developed by RPA/PCPI. |
Incentives or Adjustements
|
Eligible professionals can earn a 0.5% incentive payment in 2012.
|
| Resources Available/ Participation Information |
How to Participate (CMS Guide) List of all PQRS Measures RPA guide to participating, including reporting options and relevant measures
|
|
|
Project Name
|
Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program |
Description
|
The transmission, using electronic media, of prescription or prescription-related information between a prescriber, dispenser, pharmacy benefit manager, or health plan either directly or through an intermediary, including an eRx network.
A successful individual eRx prescriber must generate and report one or more eRxs associated with a patient visit, a minimum of 25 unique visits per year. Each visit must be accompanied by the eRx G-code attesting that during the patient visit at least one prescription was electronically prescribed. In order to report this measure, a qualified electronic prescribing (eRx) system must have been adopted. |
Status
|
CMS program started in 2009. The eRx program is separate from and is in addition to the Physicians Quality Reporting System (PQRS) [Formerly PQRI]. Eligible professionals do not need to participate in PQRI to participate in the Electronic Prescribing (eRx) Incentive Program.
In November 2010, CMS announced that beginning in 2012, eligible professionals who are not successful electronic prescribers may be subject to a payment adjustment. |
RPA's Role
|
RPA submitted comments to CMS on the final rule in Dec 2008 on issues such as the eligibility requirements for eligible professionals and the measure denominators.
|
Incentives or Adjustments
|
Eligible professionals can earn a 1% incentive payment in 2012. Notes:
Earning an EHR incentive in 2011 does not exempt an eligible professional from the payment adjustment. Incentive not available to professionals receiving 2011 incentive from Medicare EHR Incentive Program (Meaningful Use program).
|
Resources Available/ Participation Information
|
Overview of the eRx program How to Get Started (CMS Guide) Explanation of 2012 Payment Reductions 2012 eRx Measure Description
|
|
|
Project Name
|
Ambulatory care Quality Alliance (AQA)
|
Description
|
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American College of Physicians (ACP), America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), formed the Ambulatory care Quality Alliance to facilitate timely implementation of physician-level measures. |
Status
|
Approved by CMS in 2007 and 2008 to adopt quality measures for inclusion in the Medicare PQRI program. |
RPA's Role
|
RPA is a voting member of the AQA.
|
| Incentives or Adjustments |
N/A
|
| Resources Available/ Participation Information |
List of AQA-approved measures AQA Parameters for Selecting Measures for Physician and Other Clinical Performance
|
|
|
Project Name
|
Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program - "Meaningful Use"
|
| Description |
Established by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, to acknowledge the necessity of implementing widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) and the fact that doing so would be prohibitively expensive for most medical practices. To address the necessity and cost-prohibitive concerns regarding EHR implementation, ARRA made a $19 billion investment intended to assist physicians and hospitals in purchasing EHR systems.
Under the Medicare incentive program, each eligible professional (non-hospital based) may qualify for up to $44,000 in Medicare incentives over a five-year period beginning in 2011. Eligible professionals (EPs) who furnish more than 50 % of covered services in a geographic Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) are eligible for an additional 10 % incentive on top of the maximum incentive payment amount.
|
Status
|
On July 13, 2010 CMS released the final regulation on the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive program. This final rule pertains to Stage 1, which covers the first two years of adoption and meaningful use of certified EHR technology. Stages 2 and 3 will be defined in future rulemaking. The program began Jan 1, 2011. Eligible Professionals must complete 15 core objectives; 5 objectives out of 10 from menu set; and 6 total Clinical Quality Measures (3 core or alternate core, and 3 out of 38 from additional set).
|
RPA's Role
|
RPA submitted comments to CMS on the proposed rule on issues such as insurance eligibility and claims requirements, computerized provider order entry (CPOE), clinical quality measures, patient-system interaction, privacy and security audit requirements, and laboratory results management. Some of these issues were addressed in the final rule. |
| Incentives or Adjustments |
Eligible professionals can earn up to $44,000 in incentives for successfully participating in the Medicare program OR $63,750 for the Medicaid program.
Note: Eligible professionals cannot receive incentive payments for both Meaningful Use and e-prescribing program. |
| Resources Available/ Participation Information |
Getting Started with Meaningful Use (CMS Guide) Meaningful Use Program Overview
|
|
|
Project Name
|
Physician Compare Web Site
|
Description
|
Required by Section 10331 of the Affordable Care Act, the Physician Compare Web site will contain information on physicians enrolled in Medicare and other eligible professionals who participate in Physicians Quality Reporting System (PQRS) [formerly PQRI] and e-prescribing (eRx). |
Status
|
CMS is required to establish the site by January 1, 2011. Section 10331 of the Affordable Care Act also requires CMS to implement a plan to make information on physician performance publicly available through the Physician Compare Web site no later than January 1, 2013. It is expected it would include those who successfully participated in 2011.
CMS must submit a Report to Congress on the Physician Compare Web site by January 15, 2015. CMS is authorized to establish a demonstration program by January 1, 2019, to provide financial incentives to Medicare beneficiaries who are furnished services by high quality physicians. CMS held a town hall on Oct 27, 2010 to solicit input from stakeholders.
|
RPA's Role
|
AMA submitted comments to CMS on the proposed rule. |
| Incentives or Adjustments |
N/A
|
| Resources Available/ Participation Information |
Physician Compare Background Paper AMA Comments on Physician Compare Website (see page 13) AMA Comments on October 27, 2010 Town Hall Meeting
|
|
|
Project Name
|
CMS Quality Incentive Program (QIP)
|
Description
|
Implements a quality incentive program (QIP) for Medicare outpatient ESRD providers and facilities with payment consequences beginning January 1, 2012. The proposed ESRD QIP would reduce ESRD payments by up to 2% for dialysis providers and facilities that fail to meet or exceed a total performance score for performance standards established with respect to certain specified measures.
|
Status
|
Year 1 includes 1 hemodialysis adequacy measure and 2 anemia management measures. Although QIP payment reductions do not occur until Jan. 1, 2012, the performance period would need to occur before 2012 to allow enough time for claims processing and to evaluate facilities’ performance.
The final rule was issued December 27, 2010.
|
RPA's Role
|
RPA submitted comments on the proposed rule in Sept 2010. The comments address the importance of maintaining budget neutrality in the QIP program, reducing the maximum first-year penalty to one percent, and the impact of the program on small dialysis facilities, among other issues |
Incentives or Adjustments
|
Facilities that do not meet or exceed performance standards will be subject to a payment reduction up to 2 percent. ESRD QIP payment adjustments will apply to payments under the ESRD PPS for outpatient maintenance dialysis items and services furnished to Medicare patients by ESRD facilities between Jan. 1, 2012 and Dec. 31, 2012.
|
| Resources Available/ Participation Information |
QIP Final Rule CMS Overview of ESRD Quality Improvement
|
|
|
Project Name
|
Maintenance of Certification - ABIM
|
Description
|
Maintenance of Certification promotes lifelong learning and the enhancement of the clinical judgment and skills essential for high quality patient care. To become certified in the subspecialty of Nephrology, physicians must: At the time of application, be previously certified in internal medicine by ABIM; Satisfactorily complete the requisite graduate medical education fellowship training; Demonstrate clinical competence in the care of patients; Meet the licensure and procedural requirements; and Pass the Certification Exam in Nephrology.
|
Status
|
Every 10 years, internists and subspecialists certified in or after 1990 renew their certificates through ABIM's Maintenance of Certification program. Candidates must be credentialed, pass a secure examination, and earn a total of 100 points of self-evaluation in medical knowledge and practice performance.
This structure consists of four components, each designed to assess important physician characteristics: professionalism (Part I), self-assessment and lifelong learning (Part II), cognitive expertise (Part III), and performance in practice (Part IV) which includes Approved Quality Improvement (AQI) programs. ASN offers the Nephrology Self-Assessment Program (NephSAP), where physicians can earn points.
The Accountable Care Act (ACA) requires a mechanism whereby an eligible professional may provide data on quality measures through a maintenance of certification program (MOC) operated the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) or an equivalent program. MOC Programs wishing to enable their members to be eligible for an additional PQRS incentive payment for the 2011 Physician Quality Reporting System will need to go through a self-nomination process by January 31, 2011. Rules concerning MOC for 2012 were included in the proposed Medicare Fee Schedule released July 1, 2011.
|
| RPA's Role |
Ongoing monitoring and collaboration with ASN. Nephrology Self-Assessment Program Modules is being developed by ASN.
|
| Incentives or Adjustments |
Physicians who satisfactorily report PQRS measures for 2011 can qualify for an additional .5% MOC incentive for 2011 if certain requirements are met. |
| Resources Available/ Participation Information |
Overview of Maintenance of Certification Practice Performance Modules Nephrology Blueprint ASN Nephrology Self-Assessment Program (NephSAP) PQRS and MOC (CMS) MOC Guide for Nephrologists
|